|
Laser or Camera - Comparison |
|
As the families of inspection technologies overlap in a number of dimensions,
it is most useful to compare extremes. Telecentric laser systems and camera
systems are compared below for coated or uncoated high quality optical film
and glass.
Laser System Advantages:
 |
Simple
packaging allows generation of multiple video channels (bright field,
dark field, transmission, reflection, etc.) with a single laser
scanner. |
 |
System
easily configured for bright and dark field video channels, in
transmission and/or reflection. |
 |
Modular
design provides simple upgrades in the future (additional
transmission/reflection channels, coating uniformity, polarity shift,
distortion, etc.) |
 |
Detection is
consistent across the line and independent of line speed. |
 |
Operation in
ambient light, no shrouding. |
 |
High power,
coherent lighting. |
 |
Wavelength
can be selected to maximize defect signature |
 |
Relatively
simple installation and alignment procedure. |
Laser System Disadvantages:
 |
Limited
detection capability for opaque, multi-colored films. Laser
systems are color-blind; a white light source is preferable. |
 |
High base
cost, relative to camera systems. Usually not cost-effective if
the task is predominately bright field or if a four-camera system can
satisfy the detection requirements. |
Camera System Advantages:
 |
Lower entry
cost. Excellent for simple/moderately difficult bright field
applications. |
 |
Intuitive.
Easier to understand. |
Camera System Disadvantages:
 |
Number of cameras required. |
 |
Bank of cameras required for each optical channel (two banks of
cameras required for bright field and dark field). |
 |
Difficulty in packaging many cameras on the production line |
 |
Alignment of cameras relative to each other. |
 |
Alignment of cameras relative to the light source, sheet/film and dark
field masking |
 |
Relatively low powered, incoherent light source. Shrouding of
the
(dark field) cameras against ambient light will be required. |
 |
High power consumption and greater operating costs. Light source
and camera-to-camera inconsistencies can result in varying detection
across the line. This inconsistency becomes more dramatic as the
number of array pixels increases (from 2048 to 8196). |
 |
Optical upgrades are very difficult. Additional bank(s) of
cameras and
possibly additional light sources (if a reflection channel is required)
would be necessary. |
|
|